<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Is A Climate Deal Not A Climate Deal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://copenhagenclimateagreement.blogactiv.eu/2009/12/19/when-is-a-climate-deal-not-a-climate-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copenhagenclimateagreement.blogactiv.eu/2009/12/19/when-is-a-climate-deal-not-a-climate-deal/</link>
	<description>The UN Climate Conference in Copenhagen in December 2009 will be aiming to reach agreement on measures to limit climate change.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:42:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Earl Salmony</title>
		<link>http://copenhagenclimateagreement.blogactiv.eu/2009/12/19/when-is-a-climate-deal-not-a-climate-deal/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Earl Salmony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copenhagenclimateagreement.blogactiv.eu/?p=753#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Nobody spoke the &quot;P&quot; word in Copenhagen............

People are not speaking out loudly and clearly about the colossal threat that is posed to humanity by the skyrocketing growth of human population numbers on Earth.

Despite the unfortunate, inhumane ways a &quot;ONE CHILD PER FAMILY&quot; policy was implemented in China, the policy could be vital for the future of humankind and life as we know it in our planetary home. The immediate, free, universal and compassionate implementation of a voluntary &quot;one child per family&quot; policy could decisively limit adverse, human-driven impacts on Earth&#039;s body and its environs, and do so more powerfully than any other conceivable human intervention.

Given the already visible, converging global threats to human wellbeing and environmental health that are presented to the family of humanity in our time, the humane implementation of one child per family could be an indispensible centerpiece of a set of adequately designed, actionable programs that serve to actually rescue a good enough future for the children and coming generations.

If a root cause of the global threats on humanity&#039;s horizon now is the unbridled growth of absolute global human population numbers, our willful denial of this primary cause could make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for the children to reasonably address and sensibly overcome these threats. Then the children are likely being directed down a &quot;primrose path&quot; to confront some unimaginable kind of ecological wreckage, the likes of which only Ozymandias has seen. The children will not understand why the catastrophe is occurring. Because their elders refused to acknowledge the best available scientific evidence of human population dynamics and, therewith, adequately &quot;diagnose&quot; the distinctly human-induced global predicament all of us face now, the children will not know what hit them, why it is happening, and what is required of them so as not to commit the same mistakes made by the elders.

This is only a guess but please note the likelihood that history will not be kind to the woefully inadequate leaders in my not-so-great generation of arrogant, extremely foolish and avaricious elders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody spoke the &#8220;P&#8221; word in Copenhagen&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>People are not speaking out loudly and clearly about the colossal threat that is posed to humanity by the skyrocketing growth of human population numbers on Earth.</p>
<p>Despite the unfortunate, inhumane ways a &#8220;ONE CHILD PER FAMILY&#8221; policy was implemented in China, the policy could be vital for the future of humankind and life as we know it in our planetary home. The immediate, free, universal and compassionate implementation of a voluntary &#8220;one child per family&#8221; policy could decisively limit adverse, human-driven impacts on Earth&#8217;s body and its environs, and do so more powerfully than any other conceivable human intervention.</p>
<p>Given the already visible, converging global threats to human wellbeing and environmental health that are presented to the family of humanity in our time, the humane implementation of one child per family could be an indispensible centerpiece of a set of adequately designed, actionable programs that serve to actually rescue a good enough future for the children and coming generations.</p>
<p>If a root cause of the global threats on humanity&#8217;s horizon now is the unbridled growth of absolute global human population numbers, our willful denial of this primary cause could make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for the children to reasonably address and sensibly overcome these threats. Then the children are likely being directed down a &#8220;primrose path&#8221; to confront some unimaginable kind of ecological wreckage, the likes of which only Ozymandias has seen. The children will not understand why the catastrophe is occurring. Because their elders refused to acknowledge the best available scientific evidence of human population dynamics and, therewith, adequately &#8220;diagnose&#8221; the distinctly human-induced global predicament all of us face now, the children will not know what hit them, why it is happening, and what is required of them so as not to commit the same mistakes made by the elders.</p>
<p>This is only a guess but please note the likelihood that history will not be kind to the woefully inadequate leaders in my not-so-great generation of arrogant, extremely foolish and avaricious elders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

